Thursday 10 March 2016

The Message ain't getting through...

I picked a woman up tonight who uses both Taxis and the Yank disruptors (Uber). She prefers us though. She works in PR and specifically lobbying. We had a long conversation about the "uber/TFL thing" and I gave her all the facts, ie the legal reasons they should never have been granted an operators license in London by TFL, the tax credit drivers, the non tax paying company, the inadequate driver insurance provision, the 650 licenses issued per week by TFL, the increasing rash of car crashes involving their drivers etc etc etc, the list went on.

By the end of my monologue she took a deep intake of breath and said 'Wow'.

Her answer to my points was as follows. "Why haven't I heard this before? Why isn't this in the national press? It's a compelling and well argued viewpoint. I think you've been badly let down by your trade organisations to be honest"  (her words not mine).

She said you don't need demos and blockades that piss your potential customers off (and give free advertising to 'the opposition') , you need better/proper PR and lobbying (she wasn't touting for business may I add). I tend to agree on that to some extent. But I also rather suspect it's too late for that now anyway (however, more on that later). Anyway, whether you agree with her or not, PR is her business and she's good at it, plus she's a member of the travelling public, so shouldn't we take notice?

The problem is as it always has been, that, no disrespect, the London taxi trade is run/represented by cab drivers (or former cab drivers). As noble as many of these people are I'm not sure they possess the commercial savvy and dynamism that you need to formulate effective strategies in today's cut throat commercial world. And why should they? I know I don't. But the difference is I recognise it. Our trade orgs need to do the same otherwise they'll continue to fight losing battles.

I'm probably going to upset some people when I say this but I was somewhat disappointed by the recent 'PR offensive' that saw a fair amount of money spent by well meaning people on adverts that say "always use a taxi" (I'm paraphrasing but that's effectively all it says). What's the first thing a non taxi using consumer seeing this ad is going to say?

"Why?"

Yet there is nothing extolling our virtues, no bullet list of benefits in using a London Taxi over the opposition. I appreciate space is limited but surely if you're handing thousands of £s to an ad agency this should be a minimum requirement? Particularly when we can't compete with the opposition on price, it's more important than ever in that instance to give people a reason to use us when marketing our product. Isn't it?  I'm no ad exec but I would have thought so.

Don't get me wrong, I appreciate the effort people have been going to here and it's not like I've done anything to push the cab trade myself, but this is just another example of us getting it wrong in my book. We lack the business savvy needed to take on the competition and no amount of blockades and "Londons finest" proclamations will change that in my opinion. It hasn't previously, let's face it, look where we're at now.

If the cab trade wants to get serious about taking on the opposition, for me, it has to do two things. Firstly it's trade organisations have to bat their heads together and unify as one single London Taxi Association, no more fragmentation. I appreciate this wouldn't be straight forward but it needs to happen in my opinion. This will give us way more clout and credibility. It will also provide a much bigger single pool of finance with which to address point 2. Point 2 being that we have to fight fire with fire, painful as it may be we have to sink some serious cash into targeted lobbying and marketing. Clever marketing. It needs to be coherent and most importantly it needs to be prolonged. Too many of our ad campaigns have been "come and go" affairs, too easily forgotten. In addition some have been frankly embarrassingly ill conceived.

I know it involves spending a lot of money but that is what is needed if we want to get our message to the public. Because they ain't getting it believe me. I have so many conversations with people who simply don't know the facts about our offering and our issues with TFL/uber and when they do they are enlightened. It ain't rocket science.

Anyway, that's that off my chest, I'm sorry if I've put any noses out of joint, it's only my opinion, it doesn't mean I'm right.

It was an enlightening conversation with that punter, opened my eyes to a few things. I took her business card if anyone is interested...

10 comments:

  1. Taxi drivers need to change their mentality...they are no longer King of the road and when some of the Radio Circuits book jobs that may only go £7.00 they need to be accepted promptly. All too often you get drivers hanging up on the 'good long distance work'. Radio circuits don't have piles of cash to throw at these kind of jobs. I have worked for both Addison Lee and Radio Taxis in a managerial capacity and I was once asked the type of complaint differences I encountered...so at Addison Lee the complaints were mainly 'my driver doesnt speak English! or the vehicle smells, I want a discount' whereas at Radio Taxis the complaints were more 'where is my taxi?' How long is it going to be? So you have AL complaints from the perspective of a client who is at least already onboard her vehicle it is then down to the driver to build a rapport and make it as an enjoyable journey as possible whereas from RTG perspective the complaints were coming before a client was even in a vehicle so can you blame the client for preferring the the PHV vehicle...at least they are in there way. Clients don't mind paying a few extra ££ difference if the journey they get is a) on time b) doesn't have a driver whinging about how bad their day/week/month or year has been and c) gets them to their destination promptly. All these Taxi Drivers who are causing disruption to London by attending Demos are not reflected well by potential clients in my opinion. They are causing disruption to their working day!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Couldn't agree more with you on every point you make

      Delete
  2. I've had that same conversation with many punters Alan. Most sympathetic to our trade and all concluding that our business has been out manoeuvred in the market by firstly reliable ph and more recently uber.
    Over many years we didn't take ph seriously, old cars with a big ariel stuck on the back, then they upped their game with the vehicle's they drove, licensing gave them respectability and an entry into the corporate world, while often we were still brooming and running around in rental fx's & tx's with raw suspension and no working heater, ( sure we've all driven them ).
    The police and authorities have not helped us, by turning a blind eye to touting and making it almost acceptable to get into any car in London of a night to get home ( only really getting to grips with touting after an attack ).
    But people needed to get home, I've been in the west end and been turned down by many of our own at night trying to get to Wandsworth!
    I would still always get a black cab and advise family and friends to do the same, but other members of the public, if they've had a bad experience with a black cab don't have a loyalty to our trade, why should they?
    We all know about the injustice regarding our treatment by tfl, the illegal activity and licensing of uber, their tax issues etc etc, but uber are now the acceptable face of touting,and people still want to get home, and can now often get home cheaper with them than their local ph cab operator.
    Not many are questioning why they are cheap, sadly not many care.
    How we combat uber and tfl is something I ponder during lengthy waits on ranks, I don't have an answer.
    I hope they crash and burn, but fear even if they did the app generation will still be out there and someone would enter the market to fill the void.
    I hope for a mayor who may seriously look into tfl management but doubt we'll get one.
    It's not only uber affecting our business, because of the amount of changes to road layouts,csh etc, its becoming increasingly difficult to offer passengers the benefit of the knowledge,( and therefore competitive fares ) where once there may have been 3 or 4 options to get a fare from A to B, now we are limited in the routes we take due to tfl and the inner london boroughs.
    Our strength has been that we are 25 thousand individuals but thats also our weakness. I, like you hope for a unified trade with one mouthpiece and a consistent message, I also would like to see a fully independent pco, and if we are to have compulsory CC terminals how about an oyster one too?
    These are very difficult times, and it seems we are lacking friends in the right place, I'm encouraged by the recent activity of LBC radio but agree with you that a more sustained campaign of lobbying is probably the only way to raise awareness of all the issues facing us.
    Be lucky

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agree with everything you've written there, couldn't have put it better myself.

      Delete
    2. Agree with everything you've written there, couldn't have put it better myself.

      Delete
  3. Agree with all you've said , I've wanted one Union not the current splits that make it look like the life of Brian sketch arguing between themselves instead of the real enemy (the Romans/TFL) one Union one office one newspaper would streamline costs and get more members in and free money for PR & lobbying. Sadly it doesn't seem any closer despite our oncoming demise. Our biggest problem is not uber (that's 2nd) but the traffic/CSH etc and constant road closures and banned turns that make taxi journeys not viable anymore and will only get worse,if we had proper support we should be lobbying with councils & cycling groups to make London cycle & taxi friendly and ban cars vans etc,we can't beat the cycle lobby so we should join them. I also have many chats with customers and also active on Twitter and have been amazed how the public agree when the facts are put over well and also been surprised by the amount of people who hate cab drivers for past brooming/cash only/unhelpful and no matter how I try to be a perfect cabbie I'm up against a wall of past sins not committed by me. But even if we had all acted well in the past I feel that the cheapness of uber would have come through anyway in the end,people are skint and companies cutting back,we cannot compete whilst driving the £42k taxi and we should be raising the disabled access argument and the fact it puts fares up and should it be lost or subsidised because it's unfair on us and it's an angle that would gain support as we are the good guys and no one can spin it otherwise,I've been banging on about the unions teaming up with disabled groups but they seem very slow on that front. I'm resigned to the fact that it's probably too late for it to turn around and the low uptake of cabbies donating to the crowdfunding shows we have too many apathetic drivers amongst us to pull us back to having a future

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your point about the crowd funding is very poignant. Very disappointing result. I do wonder though if the message got out to enough drivers. When you're on twitter you tend to imagine the whole world is on there despite the fact probably only 20% of the fleet are actually active on twitter. I know it's been leafletted and so on but nonetheless a lot of cabbies operate in their own little bubbles. Despite all that it's still very poor the amount of people who have pledged.

      Delete
  4. 888 Casino - Mississippi Online Gaming, Inc. - JD
    888 Casino 통영 출장샵 양산 출장샵 This website uses cookies to improve your 화성 출장안마 experience and experience. Read our cookie policy 대전광역 출장샵 to ensure you 대전광역 출장샵 are getting the best experience possible.

    ReplyDelete